Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

16,425,136

Short Interest Shares

217,958

Float (%)

95.06

Institutional Ownership (%)

54.05

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

24.02

Insider Ownership (%)

4.94

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

39.09

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
BlackRock Inc.	1,376,585	8.38	45,289,647	12/31/2019	77,495
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,185,013	7.21	38,986,928	12/31/2019	(7,886)
Banc Funds Company LLC	787,536	4.79	25,909,934	12/31/2019	(77,400)
Vanguard Group Inc.	772,742	4.70	25,423,212	12/31/2019	11,724
Tributary Capital Management LLC	367,382	2.24	12,086,868	12/31/2019	(11,183)
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	362,546	2.21	11,927,763	12/31/2019	18,198
North Star Asset Management Inc	259,360	1.58	8,532,944	12/31/2019	(5,042)
Bank of America Corp.	242,960	1.48	7,993,384	12/31/2019	(2,983)
Geode Capital Management LLC	225,391	1.37	7,415,364	12/31/2019	10,278
LSV Asset Management	219,997	1.34	7,237,901	12/31/2019	(16,300)
Northern Trust Global Investments	210,711	1.28	6,932,392	12/31/2019	(4,605)
RBC Global Asset Management Inc.	171,246	1.04	5,633,993	12/31/2019	(23,420)
Wellington Management Group LLP	136,743	0.83	4,498,845	12/31/2019	(14,900)
BNY Asset Management	130,174	0.79	4,282,725	12/31/2019	14,291
Arrowstreet Capital Ltd. Partnership	112,389	0.68	3,697,598	12/31/2019	85,065
Acadian Asset Management LLC	105,470	0.64	3,469,963	12/31/2019	25,454
Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc.	100,396	0.61	3,303,028	12/31/2019	2,059
John W. Rosenthal Capital Management Inc.	75,000	0.46	2,467,500	9/30/2019	0
Wells Fargo & Co.	74,818	0.46	2,461,512	12/31/2019	9,757
TIAA	67,813	0.41	2,231,048	12/31/2019	(6,356)

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 146)

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.