Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

16,594,290

Short Interest Shares

109,965

Float (%)

88.90

Institutional Ownership (%)

48.46

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

21.26

Insider Ownership (%)

11.10

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

31.93

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
BlackRock Inc.	1,136,353	6.85	32,465,605	9/30/2018	56,701
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,081,660	6.52	30,903,026	9/30/2018	32,735
Renaissance Technologies LLC	790,115	4.76	22,573,586	9/30/2018	29,600
Vanguard Group Inc.	718,648	4.33	20,531,773	9/30/2018	5,818
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	349,146	2.10	9,975,101	9/30/2018	7,049
Tributary Capital Management LLC	341,530	2.06	9,757,512	9/30/2018	32,529
North Star Asset Management Inc	258,484	1.56	7,384,888	9/30/2018	(4,330)
LSV Asset Management	246,197	1.48	7,033,848	9/30/2018	(5,200)
Northern Trust Global Investments	205,184	1.24	5,862,107	9/30/2018	8,493
Geode Capital Management LLC	171,842	1.04	4,909,526	9/30/2018	4,328
Wellington Management Group LLP	155,540	0.94	4,443,778	9/30/2018	(100,353)
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc.	155,473	0.94	4,441,864	9/30/2018	88,722
RBC Global Asset Management Inc.	154,316	0.93	4,408,808	9/30/2018	(6,560)
BNY Asset Management	112,206	0.68	3,205,725	9/30/2018	1,562
Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc.	112,017	0.68	3,200,326	9/30/2018	5,433
Thomson Horstmann & Bryant Inc.	95,308	0.57	2,722,950	9/30/2018	885
TIAA	88,358	0.53	2,524,388	9/30/2018	(6,505)
Morgan Stanley	83,943	0.51	2,398,252	9/30/2018	(4,589)
John W. Rosenthal Capital Management, Inc.	80,000	0.48	2,285,600	9/30/2018	0
Assenagon Asset Management S.A.	76,951	0.46	2,198,490	9/30/2018	76,951

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 143)

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.