Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

16,610,434

Short Interest Shares

132,645

Float (%)

88.70

Institutional Ownership (%)

47.12

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

21.09

Insider Ownership (%)

11.30

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

31.58

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
BlackRock Inc.	1,079,652	6.50	35,898,429	6/30/2018	125,179
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,048,925	6.31	34,876,756	6/30/2018	56,045
Renaissance Technologies LLC	760,515	4.58	25,287,124	6/30/2018	56,600
Vanguard Group Inc.	712,830	4.29	23,701,598	6/30/2018	9,227
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	342,097	2.06	11,374,725	6/30/2018	(4,148)
Tributary Capital Management LLC	334,596	2.01	11,125,317	6/30/2018	26,137
North Star Asset Management Inc	262,814	1.58	8,738,566	6/30/2018	(11,076)
Wellington Management Group LLP	255,893	1.54	8,508,442	6/30/2018	18,785
LSV Asset Management	251,397	1.51	8,358,950	6/30/2018	(2,700)
Northern Trust Global Investments	196,691	1.18	6,539,976	6/30/2018	2,347
Geode Capital Management LLC	167,514	1.01	5,569,841	6/30/2018	30,023
RBC Global Asset Management Inc.	160,876	0.97	5,349,127	6/30/2018	(59,670)
Millennium Management LLC	134,184	0.81	4,461,618	6/30/2018	5,122
BNY Asset Management	110,644	0.67	3,678,913	6/30/2018	(2,163)
Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc.	106,584	0.64	3,543,918	6/30/2018	33,236
TIAA	94,863	0.57	3,154,195	6/30/2018	22,378
Thomson Horstmann & Bryant Inc.	94,423	0.57	3,139,565	6/30/2018	(7,700)
Morgan Stanley	88,532	0.53	2,943,689	6/30/2018	2,158
John W. Rosenthal Capital Management, Inc.	80,000	0.48	2,660,000	6/30/2018	2,000
First Trust Advisors LP	67,681	0.41	2,250,393	6/30/2018	2,723

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 147)

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.